So, I got a 3.0 on a psych exam that I didn't study for, didn't even read everything for, and didn't fuckin' go to class for.
As Russ pointed out, I must just guess, and use logic and reasoning, really well.
I got to thinking: isn't that what we just do every day anyway?
Don't we all just see things in multiple-choice format?
You've finished a nice meal at a restaruant. Do you now:
A) Pay the bill, but 'neglect' to leave a tip
B) Pay the bill, and let the waiter keep the change, amounting to about a 25% tip
C) Jump on the table and take a dump
D) Pay the bill, and wait for the waiter to give you change, so you can give him exactly 15%
Wow, and just like any multiple-choice problem, there's always that one you can eliminate right away.
Unfortunately, life doesn't fit into A, B, C, and D options. If we tried to standardize the multitude of options available to us in every encounter, that'd be a fucking huge scantron sheet--options A1-Z1 and A2-G2, or something to that effect.
Life doesn't have right answers either. So long as I wind up paying the bill, I've done the right thing. Of course, there are some who would say I'd have to pay the bill
and tip the waiter before I could be considered as doing the right thing. "Right" is relative when it comes to decisions in life--whereas grammatical, mathematical, and scientific rules are generally constant and exceptions are few and accepted.
It'd be a lot easier if time would stop anytime a hard decision was about to happen, and ghostly white phantom letters would appear in front of me in the form of a multiple-choice question. I could take my time to choose, and even after I chose, I could still go back and revise my answer. There have been a few times when I wish I could've changed the first choice I made.
But, shit doesn't work like that. One slips on shit, shit happens when one least expects it, shit hits the fan, and we're always cleaning up after our own shit, but we can never unshit shit.
Life wouldn't be as interesting if all the choices were known to us right away. It'd be like playing a video game the second time through--you know the story, you know where the traps and ambushes are, and you know where all the bonuses and weapons are.
Still, I'd love to see ethics on the SAT. How would we study for that? Furthermore, colleges could consider that into admissions, though I see one problem: the law school would no doubt be accepting applicants based on the
WRONG end of the spectrum of that score.
Posted by Tyler
at
10:27
| Comments (0)
| Trackbacks (0)